Elon Musk has referred to India’s absence on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) as “absurd.”
The billionaire tech tycoon Elon Musk has referred to India’s absence on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) as “absurd.” According to the CEO of Tesla, the UNSC must be reorganised as a result of probably the most populous nations in the world are not sufficiently represented in its present configuration.
Musk mentioned in a put up on X (previously Twitter), “At some point, there needs to be a revision of the UN bodies. Problem is that those with excess power don’t want to give it up. India not having a permanent seat on the Security Council, despite being the most populous country on Earth, is absurd.” He additionally argued in favour of Africa’s permanent membership in the best UN physique.
At some level, there must be a revision of the UN our bodies.
Problem is that these with extra energy don’t wish to give it up.
India not having a permanent seat on the Security Council, regardless of being probably the most populous nation on Earth, is absurd.
Africa collectively ought to…
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 21, 2024
His feedback got here after UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed concern about the dearth of an African nation on the UN Security Council’s permanent membership record. “How can we accept that Africa still lacks a single Permanent Member in the Security Council?”
India has spent years preventing for a permanent seat on the UNSC desk. However, China, which has used its veto energy to forestall India’s inclusion, has resisted its makes an attempt to acquire a permanent seat. Nevertheless, India’s candidature has acquired help from different permanent members, such because the United States and France.
Currently recognised by the UNSC are the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China as its 5 permanent members, or the “P5”. These nations maintain appreciable authority, which incorporates the proper to veto resolutions. Elected to two-year phrases, non-permanent members help the agenda however do not have the identical veto energy as permanent members.
The UN Security Council was beforehand criticised sharply by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, who referred to it as a “old club” the place present members refuse to permit new members out of concern for a lack of energy.
He mentioned, “Security Council is like an old club, where there are set members who don’t want to let go of the grip. They want to keep control over the club. Not very keen to admit more members, not keen to have their practices questioned.” He additionally emphasised how the UN’s effectiveness is declining on account of an absence of reforms.
