Pant was showcasing his batting prowess amidst a crumbling Indian top-order, single-handedly conserving India’s hopes alive in the chase of 147 runs on a spin-friendly monitor.
The third India vs New Zealand Test match in Mumbai was stuffed with heartbreak and controversy, notably surrounding a DRS resolution involving Rishabh Pant. The southpaw, recognized for his stellar performances in red-ball cricket, fell sufferer to Ajaz Patel’s spectacular bowling show, which noticed him take a complete of 11 wickets in each innings mixed.
Pant was showcasing his batting prowess amidst a crumbling Indian top-order, single-handedly conserving India’s hopes alive in the chase of 147 runs on a spin-friendly monitor. However, his valiant effort got here to an finish in the twenty second over when he was dismissed for 64 runs by Patel. The dismissal occurred when Pant tried to defend a supply, just for the ball to hit his pads and pop up for a catch by wicketkeeper Tom Blundell.
Despite preliminary hesitation from New Zealand to evaluation the choice, they in the end took the chance and it paid off as UltraEdge confirmed a spike because the ball handed the bat. Pant, nonetheless, appeared unconvinced and engaged in discussions with the umpires, suggesting that the bat hitting the pad might have brought about the spike. Nevertheless, the TV umpire intervened and overturned the on-field umpire’s resolution, ruling Pant out.
The dismissal left Pant visibly upset as he made his approach again to the pavilion, leaving India struggling at 106/7, nonetheless 41 runs in need of the goal.
Following the incident, social media was inundated with allegations of foul play, prompting former South African cricketer AB de Villiers to weigh in on the controversy.
“Controversy! Little grey area once again. Did Pant get bat on that or not? Problem is when the ball passes the bat at exactly the same time a batter hits his pad snicko will pick up the noise. But how sure are we he hit it? I’ve always worried about this and here it happens at a huge moment in a big Test match. Where’s hotspot?!” – wrote De Villiers in a submit shared on X.
Controversy! Little gray space as soon as once more. Did Pant get bat on that or not? Problem is when the ball passes the bat at precisely the identical time a batter hits his pad snicko will decide up the noise. But how certain are we he hit it? I’ve at all times anxious about this and right here it occurs at a…
— AB de Villiers (@ABdeVilliers17) November 3, 2024
De Villiers questioned the choice made by the TV umpire, emphasizing that even in instances of uncertainty, the third umpire ought to defer to the on-field name.
“Fact is there must’ve been doubt. Surely you stay with on-field call then? Unless the 3rd Ump clearly saw a deviation? I’m not so sure. And don’t get me wrong, I have no bias here, just pushing for consistent calls and good use of tech,” De Villiers added.
New Zealand emerged victorious in the third Test in Mumbai, securing a 25-run win. Prior to this, they’d triumphed over India by eight wickets in Bengaluru and by 113 runs in Pune. This collection marked the primary time that India had been whitewashed at dwelling in a collection with three or extra Tests.
Also learn| ‘As a batter and captain…’: Rohit Sharma’s robust response after collection whitewash in opposition to New Zealand
