The sufferer of the 2017 Unnao rape case, alongside with her mother, met officers of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) within the nationwide capital on Saturday and submitted a grievance alleging that the investigating officer (IO) colluded with a decide to make sure the accused facet wins.
The sufferer of the 2017 Unnao rape case, alongside with her mother, met officers of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) within the nationwide capital on Saturday and submitted a grievance alleging that the investigating officer (IO) colluded with a decide to make sure the accused facet wins.
Speaking to reporters after the assembly, the sufferer stated she had sought to fulfill a senior official however was advised it was a vacation and that she ought to return on Monday. However, she stated a junior official accepted her grievance.
“The junior official has received my application and said that the senior official will meet on Monday,” the sufferer advised ANI.
Alleging severe misconduct, she claimed that the Investigating Officer (IO) had acted towards her pursuits. “The complaint is that the investigating officer has wronged me. He colluded with the judge to ensure that the other party won, so that the rape victim would lose, her courage would be broken, and she would not be able to pursue the case further,” the sufferer identified.
The sufferer’s mother additionally spoke to ANI, stating that they’re able to go to the Supreme Court. “They have received my complaint. Now we have to see when the authority meets us. We trust the Supreme Court,” she stated.
She additional added that whereas the CBI is dealing with the matter, the household’s religion would rely upon whether or not the company stands by them throughout authorized proceedings. “The CBI is there, but I will only trust them if they stand by my side in the Supreme Court,” the sufferer’s mother added.
Earlier right this moment, the Unnao rape survivor and her mother voiced deep anguish and distrust towards the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Saturday, even because the company moved the Supreme Court difficult the Delhi High Court’s order suspending the life sentence of former Uttar Pradesh MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar and granting him bail.
Reacting to the event, the sufferer’s mother questioned the CBI’s intent, saying belief would come solely via direct engagement. “If CBI meets us, only then will we trust them. How can we trust them otherwise? We have not discussed CBI. We have only said that the Investigating Officer met them. He was talking to Kuldeep Sengar’s daughter. When we asked him whether he knew the victim, he said, ‘Why would I know her?’ He said this in a crowded court,” she advised ANI.
The survivor herself delivered a scathing assault, accusing the company of failing to face firmly with her throughout essential phases of the case. “Had the CBI stood with my lawyer, we wouldn’t have had to see this day. We would have won, and they would have lost,” she stated.
Describing the affect of the case on her household, the survivor added, “Their family is bursting crackers. But ask my family. My father was killed. My husband and I were fired from our jobs. What will we eat? Where do we go? I have two newborns.”
The survivor additionally alleged intimidation and injustice, claiming that whereas her household suffered, the accused was given leniency. “This is an injustice that one family was intimidated while the other person was given a free pass,” she stated, making sharp allegations towards the judiciary.
Earlier on Friday, the CBI filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) earlier than the Supreme Court difficult the Delhi High Court’s December 23, 2025, order that suspended Sengar’s life sentence pending attraction and granted him bail.
Sengar was convicted in December 2019 within the Unnao rape case and sentenced to life imprisonment alongside with a advantageous of Rs 25 lakh. Though granted bail on this case, he’ll proceed to stay in jail as he’s serving a 10-year sentence in one other CBI case associated to homicide.
The High Court’s determination has drawn sharp criticism from the sufferer’s household and opposition events, intensifying stress for Supreme Court intervention.
(Inputs from ANI)
