The Law Commission exhibits issues relating to lowering the age of consent to 16, citing unintended consequences and potential hurt.
The Law Commission of India has proposed not lowering the age of consent beneath little one intercourse abuse legal guidelines from 18 years to 16 years. However, it suggests permitting courts to impose milder sentences when consensual relationships happen between adolescents and females aged 16 to 18. The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act presently units a minimal jail sentence.
According to the fee adolescents aged 16 to 18 ought to nonetheless be thought of youngsters entitled to authorized safety, and the age of consent ought to stay unchanged. This advice arises from a rising debate over the age of consent beneath Pocso, with issues raised by a number of excessive courts that consensual teenage relationships had been being criminalized beneath the stringent 2012 legislation designed to safeguard youngsters from sexual violence.
Here’s why the Law Commission is worried:
1. Reducing the age of consent to 16 might result in unintended and extreme consequences.
2. Changes on this legislation may adversely affect efforts in opposition to little one marriage and little one trafficking.
3. Decriminalizing sexual relations between 16 to 18-year-olds might undermine the effectiveness of the POCSO Act.
The fee’s chairman initiated this examine in response to a reference from the Karnataka excessive court docket in November 2022, which steered reevaluating the age of consent as a consequence of an rising quantity of circumstances involving women above 16 years falling in love, eloping, and fascinating in sexual actions with boys, leading to Pocso circumstances. In April of the identical yr, the Madhya Pradesh excessive court docket additionally wrote to the fee, arguing that the present enforcement of the Pocso Act led to gross injustice in circumstances of statutory rape the place de facto consent was current.
In response to those issues, the fee really useful granting “guided judicial discretion” in sentencing for such circumstances. This strategy goals to tell apart circumstances with obvious de facto consent from these initially supposed to fall beneath the Pocso Act, guaranteeing a extra balanced and child-centered software of the legislation. The particular choose will contemplate particular elements when figuring out sentences in circumstances of convictions, aligning with one of the best pursuits of the kid.
Read extra: ‘Governments will have to…’: EAM S Jaishankar over Khalistani terrorist Nijjar’s dying
